Luhbo wrote on 05/14/09 at 04:33:11:Yes, I don't. Because I found that cells are changing dependent on their neighbour cells. After some time, when bigger parts, bigger areas are "flatened" the correction factors in fact go down to max. 2 or 3 percent. In the beginning not.
Are you damping the LC-1 to 1/3 second or something? My experience is that autotune only alters the map after a stable reading almost spot-on a target. I see what you mean but I don't see it ending up significantly wrong. When large parts of the map has been put off autotune, you could reset it and do another pass. I'm pretty sure mine would come out pretty accurate after that.
Anyway you could still do a limited pizza dough rollout first at the most important areas, then manually set that good block of cells in open loop (or "no auto tune" per below), and only then you enter this mode.
Also, let's say the software won't put a cell off autotune until the correction was much lower than limit, like 2 or 3%.
Maybe there could be another 'bit' in the O2 flag of each cell, setting it as "no auto tune" but leaving the target, and closed loop, intact. This is a separate idea that could have advantages even if you do the rest manually. I'm just thinking loud here, I'm not sure if it would do good or bad. If nothing else it would stop autotune from endlessly alter good parts of the map with 1-2%.
Cliff has probably tried a lot of algorithms and methods over the years, maybe he already tried some of this and ditched it...